Home
Why
snipe
?
Compare
FAQ
Community
Terms
Contact
My Snipes
Home
Why
snipe
?
Compare
FAQ
Community
Terms
Contact
My Snipes
Menu
Home
Why
snipe
?
Compare
FAQ
Community
Terms
Contact
Username
Password
Login is SSL protected. By clicking on "Log in Now" you agree to gixen.com
terms of usage.
Search
Gixen.com Forum Index
->
Suggestions and Ideas
Post a reply
Username
Subject
Anti-Bot check:
Enter characters from the following image:
Message body
Emoticons
View more Emoticons
Font colour:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
White
Black
Font size:
Tiny
Small
Normal
Large
Huge
Close Tags
Options
HTML is
OFF
BBCode
is
ON
Smilies are
ON
Disable BBCode in this post
Disable Smilies in this post
All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Jump to:
Select a forum
Gixen
----------------
Announcements
Support
Suggestions and Ideas
Impressions
Blog
Topic review
Author
Message
Danny
Posted: Sun Jan 29, 2023 9:14 am
Post subject:
Cupid wrote:
Danny wrote:
broken link
I fixed that for you.
My view (in agreement with you) is that this type of group should, most usefully, be implemented as:
The first auction determines whether all the rest are bid on or not. So, if the first is lost all the rest are cancelled (as now) but if the first is won all the rest are scheduled as if they were no longer part of a group at all.
That would be perfect :) thanks for the edit too
Cupid
Posted: Sun Jan 29, 2023 6:41 am
Post subject:
Danny wrote:
broken link
I fixed that for you.
My view (in agreement with you) is that this type of group should, most usefully, be implemented as:
The first auction determines whether all the rest are bid on or not. So, if the first is lost all the rest are cancelled (as now) but if the first is won all the rest are scheduled as if they were no longer part of a group at all.
Danny
Posted: Sat Jan 28, 2023 6:25 pm
Post subject:
Another scenario for âsingle contingencyâ:
Item 1: wins
Item 2: wins
Item 3: wins
Item 4: loses
Item 5: bid should still go ahead, since the âsingle contingencyâ (the first bid) won
Danny
Posted: Sat Jan 28, 2023 5:37 pm
Post subject:
Yeahhhhhhh⦠when you insert a link it tells you that h t t p s is blocked for being spam. Changing it to h t t p doesnât help. Now thereâs a nice broken link in my post :P
Danny
Posted: Sat Jan 28, 2023 5:35 pm
Post subject: Don’t cancel the 3rd contingency bid if the 2nd bid loses
Hey,
Cupid said in
this support thread
that if you have the following contingency bids setup:
Item 1: wins
Item 2: loses
Item 3: scheduled
Then the bid for item 3 will be cancelled.
Is there any way you could implement a new group for âÃÂÃÂsingle contingency bidâÃÂàplease? This would mean that the bid for item 3 would still go ahead if item 1 wins but item 2 loses.
Thanks a lot!
Danny
© 2006 - 2023 Gixen.com. Forum powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group.