Username
Password
Login is SSL protected. By clicking on "Log in Now" you agree to gixen.com terms of usage.


   SearchSearch     

Monthly Payment

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Gixen.com Forum Index -> Suggestions and Ideas
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
AwryGoofy
Guest





PostPosted: Sat Oct 25, 2025 10:47 am    Post subject: Monthly Payment Reply with quote

Just would like to express my sincere gratitude and opinion. ?

Thank you for making this for the community. You are a good person.

I'd like to convince you that you're wrong about providing Gixen for free. I think that almost nothing should be provided for free. And I think nonprofits are the worst idea there is. And countries like the US should eliminate the tax benefit received by nonprofits.

I'm as liberal as they come, and that's exactly why I believe we need to get rid of nonprofits. You are basically providing goods and services to others but you're not getting anything back. I believe that everyone in society should receive a fair share of what we do together. And by providing this program for free, you are allowing us to steal your program from you. Such a system is impossible to sustain. If you continue to provide free services and goods, how will you feed yourself? Why should I take $50 worth of services from you but provide nothing back in return? Is that fair? Is that right? Hell, no.

And we all know this. And this is exactly why we feel compelled to do things like give you money for coffee or something similar. We feel guilty.

This is also why freeware are such terrible programs. They usually start out great because the best types of people start them. But the idea of a nonprofit is just dumb. After a couple of years, even the best-intentioned of people will flail. But imagine if they were paid a little bit for their work to maintain the app/program. Behold the world we would see.

Right now, developers charge way too much for their programs but others like you charge way little. You should charge a little for people to get the main body of your program. Then you should charge something minimal for your work to improve the program. Say you charge $4 for people to use your program immediately for the first year. Then they have to pay $1/year or some other structure based on bids. I think you'll get paid a lot more and you'll end up with a vastly superior product since you'll be motivated to work on it.

Ok?that's my rant for the day.
Back to top
AwryGoofy
Guest





PostPosted: Sat Oct 25, 2025 10:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Oh yeah, I forgot.

Programmers should always allow a trial period of 6-12 months for free or something very nominal. There are so many programs out there, there is no way to know if your program is better than others. By using your program, it's almost as if we users are putting in the work, testing to see if it's good.

This will allow you to also hook people into using your program as they get into a routine. It can take days or even weeks to become good at a program (aka muscle memory). So, once they get into a routine, they won't want to switch programs because of the pain in the butt learning curve.

And to get them more hooked, get them to pay for other little things that cost 10¢ each. They'll have to put in their credit card, which is the first huge battle. This is why games these days make billions via in game purchases rather than paying outright for the program. People have different needs and wants, and the size of their wallet differs. ?
Back to top
Cupid



Joined: 09 Aug 2007
Posts: 8041
Location: Bristol, UK

PostPosted: Sun Oct 26, 2025 3:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I believe I first used Gixen in 2006, it's still here, I think most would consider that well established.

Mario has developed it all that time, I'd be surprised if anyone ever questioned his abilities in this field.

Signing up to a Mirror subscription does help to support the platform long term, especially if it's a recurring payment. It also provides users with access not only to unlimited snipes but also to many additional useful features.
_________________
Mark
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
AwryGoofy
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Oct 30, 2025 11:46 am    Post subject: My Philosophy on Capitalism and Communism. They both suck. Reply with quote

Quote:
I believe I first used Gixen in 2006, it's still here, I think most would consider that well established.

Mario has developed it all that time, I'd be surprised if anyone ever questioned his abilities in this field.

Signing up to a Mirror subscription does help to support the platform long term, especially if it's a recurring payment. It also provides users with access not only to unlimited snipes but also to many additional useful features.


I'm sorry if it came out that way, but I think you misinterpreted the meaning and tenor of my post. I wasn't questioning Mario's abilities. I was praising him for all the hard work he has done till now, and I want him to get compensated for it. I strongly believe that the business model of the programming industry needs to change.

I emailed Mario about this but I think he should reconsider charging $13 upfront. Why? Well, people who use this service tend to be extremely price-conscious. So much, that the $13 is a big mental hurdle. How do I know? Because I'm one of them! People will end up paying thousands of dollars more if the transaction is set up so that they pay in smaller increments. They know this but do it anyway. This is why gaming software has moved to in-game purchases, and are making so much more money. I know that $13 is nothing, but I can't get myself to pay it. So, I'll opt to pay a few dollars more every transaction even though I know that at the end, it'll be a lot more. Yes, it's completely illogical, but that's how the human brain works!

Mario could even say that the initial $13 is a credit and that consumers will get it back if they don't use it. This way is still mentally better for people like me.

Yet, I think the best method is to charge by percentage. If Mario feels guilty about charging too much, make it .5% which is half of EZSnipers (1% is the cheapest I think). Mario will end up making a lot more. If a person wins $10,000 bids, that's $50 for Mario.

If Mario has a problem with this and thinks this is way too much, then he can state that he will only charge .5% until it reaches $13 (or any other amount he wishes). Everything after is free. This is still much better.

I hope that people here won't get mad at me because if Mario makes these changes, they will end up paying more, but I don't care if they get mad. I think that in our society, everyone should pay their fair share?no more, no less.

Right now, I hate how certain monopolistic practices are squeezing people into paying too much. You can argue that this is capitalism but I'd counter that capitalism isn't necessarily correct.

On the other hand, I dislike nonprofits because I think everyone should get paid for their work. I hate the idea of of nonprofits because it's too communist. I believe that capitalism is necessary to push people to work. The ideal economy is an optimal mixture of competition and cooperation.
Back to top
Gixen
Advertisements





PostPosted: Thu Oct 30, 2025 11:46 am    Post subject: My Philosophy on Capitalism and Communism. They both suck.

Back to top
AwryGoofy
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Oct 30, 2025 11:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Btw, the 4 limit might be too effective. It's really a pain in the butt, so people will immediately move to another software option. It's not merely a minor convenience.
Back to top
mario
Site Admin


Joined: 03 Oct 2006
Posts: 7298

PostPosted: Mon Nov 03, 2025 3:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Btw, the 4 limit might be too effective. It's really a pain in the butt, so people will immediately move to another software option. It's not merely a minor convenience.


I'm a little confused by your reasoning... I should charge upfront, with no free option, and people will pay, yet with the limit of 4 winning snipes they will move on when they hit it.

I'm afraid this is all conjecture on your part. The evidence shows differently, and common sense, really. Users do not move to other software when they win 4 auctions by using Gixen. By that point most, actually, subscribe. 76% of users who have scheduled bids at any given moment are mirror subscribers. It's an insanely high ratio.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
AwryGoofy
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Nov 04, 2025 12:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
I'm a little confused by your reasoning


The problem is that human beings are not necessarily logical. This is why marketing departments exist! We are organic robots that follow a rigid DNA programming. So even though our conscious (System 2 thinking) might now a certain course of action is stupid, we will do it anyway because we have no choice. For example, consider road rage. Does that ever seem logical?

Quote:
Users do not move to other software when they win 4 auctions by using Gixen.


I explained it poorly. No, I didn't mean that people move on when they hit 4 auctions. I meant that they will give Gixen a try. But when they need to place more than 4 auctions bids (or less if they already won bids for the month), they will need to use a second eBay sniper for any bids above 4 that they have. However, using 2 eBay snipers is annoying. So, at this point, they will either pay for Gixen or use a different sniper.

Quote:
76% of users who have scheduled bids at any given moment are mirror subscribers. It's an insanely high ratio.


Actually, your stat reinforces my point! As you just admitted, most people who have scheduled bids are mirror customers. People who schedule bids do not want to use Gixen for free. Why? Because as I said above, it's just too annoying to use with that monthly 4-bid constraint. They will either decide to sign up for Gixen or go somewhere else.

The only people who will stay and use Gixen for free will only be casual eBay users who don't bid very much. And you won't make any money on them. Furthermore, as you admitted, they don't represent a lot of people. They don't represent a lot of people because they go elsewhere.

****

I remember reading a post that stated that other software companies have an entire team and they end up signing users who are many multiples of Gixen's. Well, this is one reason why. When they are looking for an eBay sniper program, it's easy to just sign up with a service like ezsniper. You don't have to put any money upfront so it's easier mentally. This is exactly why gaming software is making a killing on in-game purchases. It's easy mentally to pay for a dollar here and there. For Candy Crush, some people spend $40,000 per year. Those are all from a dollar purchases!

Second, as I stated above, why should you want to give away your program for free? It makes no sense! Yes, your heart is in the right place. I applaud you for this. However, you put a lot of hard work into it and you're willing to have people benefit from that even though these people have more than enough money? Freeware is, I'm sorry, the dumbest ideal. It's not thought-through.
Back to top
mario
Site Admin


Joined: 03 Oct 2006
Posts: 7298

PostPosted: Wed Nov 05, 2025 1:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:

I remember reading a post that stated that other software companies have an entire team and they end up signing users who are many multiples of Gixen's.


Gixen is by far the biggest sniping service when it comes both to number of users and volume of purchases. No other service comes even close.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
AwryGoofy
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Nov 07, 2025 4:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
mario wrote:
Quote:
AwryGoofy wrote:
I remember reading a post that stated that other software companies have an entire team and they end up signing users who are many multiples of Gixen's.


Gixen is by far the biggest sniping service when it comes both to number of users and volume of purchases. No other service comes even close.


I don't know because I'm not privy to that information. But my point is that you are underpricing your work. You should make enough money where you can hire a team and improve the software.

In our society today, wealth inequality is at an all-time high. You've got billionaires who squeeze the masses. They charge more than they should. Why? Because capitalism not only says it's ok but says it's good. It's not.

On the other hand, you've got people who undercharge and so they can't make a difference. The analogy isn't exactly the same but consider about how everyone in South America don't pay taxes. Well, some say that if you believe everyone should pay their fair share, why don't you? Well, if you pay your fair share, how will that fix things? In fact, if you pay your fair share, it will make it easier for other people to cheat on their taxes because the government will be even less willing to fix things. The best way to fix the situation is to not pay taxes. Until the law changes and everyone pays their fair share, you should refuse to pay taxes either.

Similarly, the best way for you to make a difference/impact is to charge more for your software. Improve it. Then use the proceeds to seek change in our society. Elon Musk used his wealth to solidfy and increase his wealth. Instead, go after him.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Gixen.com Forum Index -> Suggestions and Ideas All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

© 2006 - 2023 Gixen.com. Forum powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group.