Home
Why
snipe
?
Compare
FAQ
Community
Terms
Contact
My Snipes
Home
Why
snipe
?
Compare
FAQ
Community
Terms
Contact
My Snipes
Menu
Home
Why
snipe
?
Compare
FAQ
Community
Terms
Contact
Username
Password
Login is SSL protected. By clicking on "Log in Now" you agree to gixen.com
terms of usage.
Search
Gixen.com Forum Index
->
Support
Post a reply
Username
Subject
Anti-Bot check:
Enter characters from the following image:
Item ID warning
Please provide eBay item id number (unless provided already) in the post message if you have a question about specific item.
I cannot investigate an issue without it
.
Message body
Emoticons
View more Emoticons
Font colour:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
White
Black
Font size:
Tiny
Small
Normal
Large
Huge
Close Tags
[quote="Cupid"][quote="nochkin"]Havethisone, another suggestion.. If 31.00 is what you really want to pay (not 32.00), then bid few pennies more, like 32.01 or so. It won't hurt your budget, but will increase your chances to win (especially in this case).[/quote] Yes I agree that is good advice. However in this case it would have had to have been a bid of more than 31.01 (because kamranr's bid at Dec-23-07 22:03:24 PST must have been at least 31.01 for eBay to have accepted it), perhaps havethisone didn't want to pay much more than 31.00. BTW a belated Happy New Year to everyone here (I was waiting until I could be at least partialy 'On Topic' ;-) )[/quote]
Options
HTML is
OFF
BBCode
is
ON
Smilies are
ON
Disable BBCode in this post
Disable Smilies in this post
All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Jump to:
Select a forum
Gixen
----------------
Announcements
Support
Suggestions and Ideas
Impressions
Blog
Topic review
Author
Message
juangrande
Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 6:24 pm
Post subject:
Cupid wrote:
I hope you did not think me rude for not replying to your last post here... I must admit that I missed it entirely... I think that is because it was an edited post rather than a completely new one.
It never even occurred to me, Mark! I thought the discussion was interesting, as well! I had simply been working under a misconception. Thanks for pointing it out!
John
Cupid
Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 9:44 am
Post subject:
Hi John,
I hope you did not think me rude for not replying to your last post here... I must admit that I missed it entirely... I think that is because it was an edited post rather than a completely new one.
Anyway I came back (eventually) to provide another example for our readers, if you view the bidding of miss_me_when_im_gone on auction 350012049642 it demonstrates what is possible in this respect.
I'm certainly not recommending that type of bidding, however thinking about it further:
1> I can see if you bid every penny between one increment above the current bid and what you are prepared to pay then you could perhaps save almost an increment in your costs if you won the auction. eBay would only take the bid at the next highest bidders price (the same as one of your own bids) as the winning bid, i.e. not add an extra increment from your proxy bid... Of course it doesn't work because it just attracts more bids from others. The time and effort involved in setting it up would be a waste of time, in my view.
2> It could also intimidate other bidders into thinking that you have bid higher than you actually have (if they looked at the bid history) and perhaps refrain from actually bidding against you even if they were prepared to pay more. This doesn't work because bidders rarely look at the bid history, and even if they do they are unlikely to be intimidated by it particularly if they really want the item, and are prepared to pay more than the current price plus one increment.
Perhaps there are other reasons that people might bid this way?... Anyway its cetainly been an interesting discussion, hasn't it?
juangrande
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 5:20 pm
Post subject:
nochkin wrote:
Before havethisone sniped this auction, it was at 29.32 (with hidden bid 31.00 from kamranr) so the next increment is 30.32 to be accepted by eBay and 31.01 to actually win
This is not quite correct. Once
havethisone
bid, it became known that
kamranr
's next-to-last bid was
exactly
$31.00 and his last bid had to be
more
. Thus,
havethisone
could not have won with a bid of $31.01, as Mark has already pointed out.
By the way, Mark, you are
absolutely correct
! Our discussion convinced me to do the experiment: see the bid history for item 220187723871. Since
eggersjd
is my alter ego, I happen to know that his 2nd and 3rd bids are $10.45 and $10.50, respectively. When I made the last bid, eBay's only requirement was that I bid
more
than $10.45, which is exactly what you claimed. All I can say is: whoops! :roll:
BTW, if anyone is interested in a book entitled
Contributions To The Theory Of Riemann Surfaces
, they'll know exactly how much they'll have to bid to outbid me. :D
nochkin
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 3:01 pm
Post subject:
juangrande,
Before havethisone sniped this auction, it was at 29.32 (with hidden bid 31.00 from kamranr) so the next increment is 30.32 to be accepted by eBay and 31.01 to actually win (not 32.01 as I mis-typed before ;) ).
Increment is 1.00 for this price range.
Cupid
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 12:22 pm
Post subject:
juangrande wrote:
Actually, this is not quite correct, Mark. Since we know
kamranr
's bid at Dec-23-07 22:01:19 PST was exactly $31.00, his bid at Dec-23-07 22:03:24 PST had to be at least one bid increment higher than $31.00 for eBay to have accepted it, namely, $32.00. In other words, in order to bid again, one must bid at least one bid increment more than one's previous bid, even if the current bid is lower than one's previous bid. So,
havethisone
would have had to bid more than $32.00 to have a chance at winning.
Hey John,
Are you absolutely sure?... I'm pretty certain that I've encountered bidding where the high bidder has bid within an increment of themselves when placing a higher bid, indeed I've been caught out by it when I've been nasty enough to think that I don't want an item going for the current bid price, but their actual highest bid is within an incremant above what I would be happy to pay.
When
kamranr
's bid at Dec-23-07 22:03:24 PST the auction price was $29.32 (or perhaps even $28.82, I'm not certain where the bid incremant goes from $0.50 to $1.00 ?) held by their earlier bid at Dec-23-07 21:59:09 PST and seconded by their bid of $31 at 22:01:19 PST... I think that in this case (where your proxy is not entirely used) eBay will accept any bid that is above your own and also above the current increment, so $31.01 would be acceptable.
I'm very hesitant to contradict you as I do bow to you undoubted greater bidding knowledge... its just, as I say, I'm sure I've encountered the type of bidding that I'm suggesting is possible.
juangrande
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 11:16 am
Post subject:
Cupid wrote:
However in this case it would have had to have been a bid of more than 31.01 (because kamranr's bid at Dec-23-07 22:03:24 PST must have been at least 31.01 for eBay to have accepted it)
Actually, this is not quite correct, Mark. Since we know
kamranr
's bid at Dec-23-07 22:01:19 PST was exactly $31.00, his bid at Dec-23-07 22:03:24 PST had to be at least one bid increment higher than $31.00 for eBay to have accepted it, namely, $32.00. In other words, in order to bid again, one must bid at least one bid increment more than one's previous bid, even if the current bid is lower than one's previous bid. So,
havethisone
would have had to bid more than $32.00 to have a chance at winning.
Cupid wrote:
BTW a belated Happy New Year to everyone here (I was waiting until I could be at least partialy 'On Topic' :wink: )
Thanks for leaving me an opening to be at least partially 'On Topic' while wishing you a Happy New Year, Mark! :wink:
Cupid
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 9:47 am
Post subject:
nochkin wrote:
Havethisone, another suggestion..
If 31.00 is what you really want to pay (not 32.00), then bid few pennies more, like 32.01 or so.
It won't hurt your budget, but will increase your chances to win (especially in this case).
Yes I agree that is good advice. However in this case it would have had to have been a bid of more than 31.01 (because kamranr's bid at Dec-23-07 22:03:24 PST must have been at least 31.01 for eBay to have accepted it), perhaps havethisone didn't want to pay much more than 31.00.
BTW a belated Happy New Year to everyone here (I was waiting until I could be at least partialy 'On Topic' ;-) )
nochkin
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 9:15 am
Post subject:
Havethisone, another suggestion..
If 31.00 is what you really want to pay (not 32.00), then bid few pennies more, like 32.01 or so.
It won't hurt your budget, but will increase your chances to win (especially in this case).
juangrande
Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 7:05 pm
Post subject:
Here's enough of the bidding history to see what happened. Your $31.00 bid was made at 23:11:54 and
kamranr
's $31.00 bid was made at 22:01:19, a full 1 hour, 10 minutes and 35 seconds before your bid; thus,
kamranr
's bid was given precedence. Note also that
kamranr
made another bid at 22:03:24, so you would still have lost the auction: the only difference had your bid been made earlier would be that the closing price of the auction would have been one increment higher, that is, $32.00.
Code:
Bidders: 5 Total Bids: 15 Time Ended: Dec-23-07 23:11:58 PST
This item has ended.
Bidder Bid Amount Bid Time
kamranr US $31.00 Dec-23-07 22:03:24 PST
kamranr US $31.00 Dec-23-07 22:01:19 PST
havethisone US $31.00 Dec-23-07 23:11:54 PST
kamranr US $30.00 Dec-23-07 21:59:09 PST
jsg1965 US $28.32 Dec-23-07 20:41:41 PST
kamranr US $27.00 Dec-23-07 21:56:29 PST
Havethisone
Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 5:05 pm
Post subject: Requested reply
280184892376
mario
Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2007 5:45 pm
Post subject:
Post item id here so that we can take a look?
Havethisone
Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2007 4:40 pm
Post subject: Didn't get bid
I have had two occasions now where I have not won an item, but some one else did bidding the same amount. According to the bid history I bid first. ???
© 2006 - 2023 Gixen.com. Forum powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group.